Determining fees
Creative people do not usually charge fees based solely on the time and materials
we expend. Rather, we figure charges based at least partly on the continued
usage of the product. Consequently,
we usually choose the reproduction factor as the main element of our pricing
strategy because it is the most fair for our clients and for ourselves.
We collect these fees as reproduction fees in the form of selling prints and
suppling the client with additional copies of the digital images. Here’s
how it works:
The more an image is used and the
more money that is spent to publish and promote that image, then the more it
attracts the public interest which in turn leads to greater sales for a product
or publication. Like
other creative services providers, photographers do not usually charge fees
based solely on the time and materials. As any professional becomes skilled
in his or her craft, the efficiency with which we perform that task improves—and
the quality increases. If we charged based solely on time, we would be disregarding
the very benefit that our clients get from hiring a professional, such as:
Creative fees
A creative fee is the minimum amount I charge to produce the photograph(s) you require. It takes into account:
In return, you receive images that are tailored to your exact needs and that have never been seen or used before. You can be sure that, they will never show up in direct competition or at cross purposes to your intent.
Production Fees
Production charges are the charges associated with
actually producing your specific job. These charges include:
Reproduction Fees and Prints
An essential component of a photographer's income is derived from the reproduction of our images in the form of prints and digital reproductions.
When you need another digital image for use in magazine ads, annual reports, etc., we go back to the original RGB image that contains all the raw information. From there we format the image for optimum reproduction for the specified use. The only charge involved is a fee of $10 to $25 depending on the file size needed.
We do not
charge usage fees for addition usage of our image in most cases. If we shoot
it for you you may use
it as you see
fit. However we do require that we make any additional copies you might need
of the photograph in the form of prints or digital files We will make sure
the files are formatted properly for each use.
Remember, although you may have the equipment to copy or print the
image yourself, you do not have the legal right to do so. Possession of digital
images, transparencies, photographs or negatives does not give one the right
to reproduce or copy them. Under federal copyright law, the photographer
is the owner of the photograph unless there is a written transfer of copyright
ownership. Accordingly, it is important that the client understands this
in advance.
Since no outside printer will ever be as committed to producing as high-quality prints from our work as we will, we highly recommend that you allow us to produce your reprints. We have a full state-of-the-art inhouse printshop and are very competitive in our pricing. If you or your ad agency feel the need to obtain prints from a third party printer, a reproduction fee will be charges based on the size of print being reproduced.
When your needs outweigh your budget
Distinguish between your wants and your needs. Instead of cutting corners on
quality, look for getting greater value from your photography dollar. There
are always ways to pay less for photography - but bargains can be expensive.
Know when the expertise of the photographer will save money in the long run.
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property is the legal concept that certain types of ideas may
be owned by individuals, corporations, or even governments. Ideas that nobody
owns are in the "public domain," which means anyone can legally do
whatever they like with them. Intellectual property laws are laws that partition
off portions of the public domain and give the credit for, and rights to profit
from, those ideas to specific owners. In the United States, these laws have
their basis in the US Constitution (article I, section 8) and are enforced
as federal laws.
The three major types of laws that create intellectual property are trademarks,
patents, and copyrights. "Copy right" is, literally, the right to
make copies of an original, creative work such as a piece of writing, art,
software, music, etc. Any copyrightable work is automatically granted a copyright,
which must be specifically sold or given away (to someone else, or into the
public domain) in order to be lost. The copyright holder doesn't have to formally
apply for a copyright, or even to publicly state that the work is copyrighted,
and is the only one who has the right to make, distribute, or profit from copies.
Permission to make a copy of a copyrighted work is called a copyright license,
or usage license. Licensing is the standard way the copyright holder delegates
some or all of their rights to a work, to someone else. When you buy a book,
or a music CD, or software, what you're really buying is a license that allows
that copy of the copyrighted work to exist. The actual copy you get is a really
just a convenience, since with modern technology like computers and photocopiers,
copies are easy to make for yourself. But, without the license, you would be
breaking the law by doing so. A copyright license is a legal agreement stating
under what conditions someone other than the copyright holder can use the copyrighted
work. Without a valid license, copies of the work cannot legally exist.
Copyright infringement, or using a copyrighted work without a proper license,
is a serious federal offense. Large sums of money have been lost, as have jobs
and careers, because people decided to ignore the copyright laws. Nowadays,
copyright infringement is being treated as seriously as sexual harassment in
corporate America and by the judicial system. According to the law, the responsibility
lies with the user or publisher to determine, before publication, who owns
the copyright to a work and to obtain the necessary license for any use. The
law is very clear in that regard. Failure to do so constitutes an infringement
and the copyright owner may be entitled to a punitive damage award of up to
$180,000 in addition to a monetary award for the usage, plus attorney's fees
and court costs. Usage on the Internet follows the same regulations as other,
more traditional uses. Free access to the Internet does not mean that its content
is within the public domain.
For more information on copyright, please see www.editorialphoto.com/copyright
, www.whatiscopyright.org or www.loc.gov/copyright/
Licensing, Not Selling
Like most full-time photographers who intend to be around long enough to develop
lasting relationships and who want to be a consistent source of high quality
images for their clients, I am primarily in the business of producing and selling
reproductions of the photographs that I shoot. Charging only to create
the images
is not profitable for me as an independent photographer who, unlike an employee,
must provide not only my own salary, but also my own paid sick and vacation
days, my own health, disability, and liability insurance benefits, my own retirement
plan, my own photo and office equipment, and all of the other expenses that
constitute any other business's overhead. Photo buyers who are relying on the
flexibility and spontaneity of hiring a freelancer must also accept the trade-off
of paying for the services based on a business-to-business model, rather than
an employee-to-employer model.
As discussed in the section on determining fees, I follow the same business
model for my work as do other creative industries when they rent,
lease, or charge based on usage rather than actually transferring the ownership
of their creative work. When your company pays for computer software, for instance,
they pay based on the number of work stations where the software will be installed.
If you rent a movie on the way home from work, you will pay a higher fee for
a new release than for an older movie, or you will pay more money to keep a
movie for five days than for just two, right? These are licensing agreements
where charges are based upon the benefit being gained by the user, and commercial
photography works the same way.
No one image can be formated for optimum
use across multiple media formats, we will provided you with the ideal image
for each use. Clients receive an image that is tailored to their
specific needs, and do not have to worry
about seeing
the
same image that they are using to promote an environmental cause show up on
the outside of a tube of particularly fresh-smelling underarm deodorant. Royalty-free
and "clip art" discs are a cheap source of photos, but remember that
they are a cheap source of photos for a lot of people whose purposes are often
at odds with each other.
Although the term "buyout" has no legal value, it is sometimes used
by buyers to describe a transfer of rights, or to indicate their desire for "all
rights". Because of the liability issue involved in a copyright transfer,
as well as the tax implications here in South Carolina, I almost never agree
to sell my copyright, for any fee. If a client needs multiple usage for an
image, I am happy to negotiate to fill their needs. Determining the actual
needs, while sometimes difficult, is always a more prudent and practical way
to go.